


default search action
9. ICAIL 2003 Workshop: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems, Papers from the ICAIL 2003 Workshop, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, June 28, 2003. ACM 2003

Evaluation Experiences
- Jack G. Conrad, Joanne S. Claussen:

Validation: A Critical First Step in the Evaluation of Systems for Legal Corpus Determination. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 1-9 - Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley:

Experimental Design for Evaluating an AI and Law Program. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 10-13 - Hugo de Bruin, Henry Prakken, Jörgen S. Svensson:

The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong? Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 14-16
Design and Creation of Shared Resources
- Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:

Suggestions for Standard Example Sets. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 17 - Marie-Francine Moens:

An Evaluation Forum for Legal IR System? Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 18-22
Proposals for Evaluation Methodologies
- Jean Hall, Richard Hall, John Zeleznikow:

A proposal for an evaluation repository for AI and Law systems. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 23-27 - Karl Branting:

An Agenda for Empirical Research in AI and Law. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 28-35

manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.


Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCID














